Hmm, this is a contentious one.
As I see it, PCSO's were introduced to be a visible presence in the community, to be our eyes and ears whilst patrolling and to provide the public with reassurance.
The problem the government has is that the media is becoming increasingly hostile towards the notion of PCSO's as they find it unacceptable that they are paying for a person in uniform that 'can't do this and can't do that'.
And the Governments response? To allow Chief Constable's the opportunity to give their PCSO's more powers. Well this seems to be at odds with their intended purpose doesn't it?! If you give them a power of arrest then you take them off the streets for hours at a time just like Police officers.
So any move to give PCSO's more powers is illogical to me. But then why should the tax payer give a PCSO a salary greater than that of a new Constable to do a job requiring so much less training, skills, power and responsibility. More to the point why should they pay so much for someone that won't intervene when they see you getting beaten up in the park, because they are told not to?!
The way I see it, is that PCSO's are a valuable aid to Policing within their original role, but are not good value for money, and should be paid less. If they are given more powers than they cannot fulfill that role and where does it stop? The more powers you give them, the more they cost and the less value they are for money, because they can never be Police officers.